Questions on liquidity mechanisms, demand drivers, and participant strategy
post-SPORE Dutch auction
Hi ThreeFold community and team! 
With the transition to the v4 economic model and the upcoming launch of the SPORE Dutch auction, I would like to dive deeper into the underlying mechanics. This will help me, and other token holders, align on an informed, long-term strategy. I would highly appreciate it if the core team and tokenomics architects could shed some light on a few technical and operational points.
Regarding demand generation and market making, how will the price floor and stability be technically maintained immediately following the auction? I am curious if there are plans to onboard professional market makers or deploy protocol-owned liquidity pools, for example in a SPORE/USDT pair, to mitigate extreme volatility.
Furthermore, looking at the balance between emission and deflation dynamics, nodes constantly generate new SPORE through farming. What are the primary network sinks or demand drivers designed to absorb this circulating supply on the open market? Beyond the farmers themselves who require SPORE for network collateral, who do you envision as the primary buyers of the token on DEXs?
I would also like to ask about the trading infrastructure. Will participants need to rely on third-party bridges and external trading venues to swap SPORE for stablecoins like USDT or USDC, or will swapping functionality be natively integrated into the Mycelium ecosystem or TF Dashboard?
Finally, looking at long-term value drivers, which fundamental network metrics, such as the Grid utilization rate or the volume of locked AUR, does the team consider critical for the long-term utility value appreciation of SPORE, especially given the continuous node emissions?
Thank you in advance for the technical deep dive and answers. I believe these insights will help retail holders and farmers better understand the strategic vector of Project Mycelium!