I also think there should be a better balance in rewards with capacity and actual use. Now the rewards are mainly driven by the on capacity. Only there is not taken into account if the capacity could actually be used for the network. So there could be a situation where there are many rewards given to 3nodes which have a high capacity but cannot contribute this capacity to the network, because there bandwidth is way to small. Besides the rewards, this can also give a distorted picture of the capacity of the network that can actually be used.
I agree with idrnd to show in the calculator the ratio between bandwidth and capacity of CU and Su. And it would be really nice if the calculator would show what the bandwidth would be if the CU and SU from the calculator are fully used. If the needed bandwidth is visible in the calculator, there could be looked if the rewards are in line with the capacity which could be really used. Since from that moment people are able to see what the required bandwidth is for their setup. At this moment this is unknown, so you can’t blame them.